Chapter 15: Theory of Change
When you are done with this section, you’ll be able to...
Define a theory of change and understand its purpose in planning social interventions.
Describe the steps involved in developing a theory of change for a social issue.
Identify the importance of outcome goals and understand how they guide interventions.
Illustrate the role of backwards mapping in creating an evidence-based intervention.
INTRODUCTION
A theory of change builds on everything you’ve already learned about social impact work: loving the one, constructing an issue triangle with its negative consequences and contributing factors, implementing the customer-partner model, creating an ecosystem map, and applying human-centered design principles. Now, it’s time to put them all together and formulate a plan for meaningful action. A theory of change provides a roadmap for organizations to navigate the complexities of addressing social issues. It links specific actions to long-term transformation and connects evidence-based strategies with structured planning to ensure measurable impact. In this chapter, you’ll learn the process of developing a theory of change by utilizing outcome goals, logic models, and backwards mapping to craft effective and strategically organized interventions.
WHAT IS A THEORY OF CHANGE?
A theory of change is a strategic framework used to map out how an intervention or set of actions will lead to a desired future state.1 It acts as a broad overview showing the vision of the social impact project. By combining evidence-based strategies with structured planning, the theory of change ties every step of an intervention to the end goal, serving as a connector for each element in the project and giving purpose to every action.2
This connection is often articulated using an “if . . . then . . .” statement that clearly expresses the logic behind each step.3 The “if” phrase represents the planned intervention, and the “then” phrase represents the desired outcome. For example: “If you increase access to nutritious food through improved food distribution networks, then there will be a reduction in health issues like stunting or underweight children.” “If you increase access to nutritious food” is the planned intervention, and “then there will be a reduction in health issues” is the desired outcome. Well-crafted “if . . . then . . .” statements are the heart of a theory of change.
Why do you think it’s important for an organization to clearly define its theory of change before launching an intervention? How can this framework impact the success of the program?
Once the problem is well understood, the next step is to identify the desired outcomes—what long-term changes the organization hopes to see. The theory of change should then outline specific actions or interventions, explaining how these will directly lead to the desired outcomes. By linking actions to outcomes, a theory of change provides clarity on the path to achieving meaningful social change.
HOW IS A THEORY OF CHANGE DEVELOPED?
Developing a theory of change starts with a thorough understanding of the social problem being addressed.4 This involves analyzing contributing factors, negative consequences, and the broader context of the issue. Both primary data (collected first-hand) and secondary data (compiled pre-existing research) are vital in providing a complete picture of the issue. The majority of this work should have already been completed within the love the problem phase of the Social Impact Cycle.
Once the problem is well understood, the next step is to organize this information into a theory of change. First, set outcome goals—what you hope your intervention will accomplish. Second, put the contributing factors, negative consequences, and outcome goals together to form “if . . . then . . .” statements. Third, outline the specific actions or interventions you believe need to be implemented in order to achieve the desired outcomes.5 Example: If low literacy levels among elementary students (negative consequence) are driven by a lack of early reading support (contributing factor), then providing targeted literacy programs (intervention) will improve reading proficiency (outcome goal). This process links actions to outcomes, thereby creating a theory of change.
WHAT ARE OUTCOME GOALS AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT?
An important aspect of a theory of change is creating outcome goals, or the specific, measurable changes the organization aims to achieve through its intervention.6 These goals can range from short-term to long-term; however, even short-term goals should ultimately contribute to a long-term goal. Later, in the evaluation stage, these outcome goals provide a useful baseline to measure actual outcomes against desired outcomes and look for means to improve. This is how an organization measures and enhances the effectiveness of its programs, as opposed to simply tracking its activities.
Creating an effective outcome goal starts with knowing the negative consequences and contributing factors of an issue. Here’s the key: outcome goals should be the opposite of the negative consequences faced by those experiencing the social issue. If the intervention is appropriately aimed at addressing the issue’s contributing factors, outcome goals should naturally address the negative consequences identified during the initial assessment of the problem.
Example
Social Issue: High rates of childhood malnutrition in a rural community.
Contributing Factor: Limited access to affordable, nutritious food due to geographic isolation and inconsistent food supply (e.g., long distances to grocery stores, reliance on convenience foods, or irregular deliveries).
Intervention: Improve access to nutritious food by establishing a community-based distribution network, such as mobile markets, partnerships with local farmers, or subsidized produce delivery programs.
Negative Consequence: Increased rates of stunting, underweight children with weakened immune systems, leading to long-term developmental and health challenges.
Outcome Goal: A measurable reduction in childhood malnutrition—reflected in improved growth indicators, healthier weights, and stronger overall child health outcomes. (Note that this goal is the inverted or “flipped” version of the negative consequence.)
Consider a program aimed at reducing recidivism (repeated imprisonment) among adolescents. What are some negative consequences associated with this issue, and how could you use them to define outcome goals?
Now that you have determined outcome goals, brainstorm an intervention and create a simple theory of change statement (“if . . . then . . .”), explaining how that intervention could lead to potential impact.
WHAT IS A LOGIC MODEL?
A logic model is a visual tool used to expand on a theory of change. It provides a clear, structured overview of how an organization’s intervention (inputs, activities, and outputs) will lead to the desired outcomes. The logic model helps stakeholders understand how the intervention process works and ensures that every component is logically connected to the overall goal.
Although the theory of change and logic model both provide roadmaps to navigate the complexities of a social issue, it is important to acknowledge that they are not the same. While a theory of change focuses on the broader causal pathways and underlying assumptions about how and why change will occur, a logic model is a visual tool that lays out the sequence of inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes for a specific program, often serving as a more operational companion to the theory of change. Put simply, a theory of change explains ”why” change will occur, while a logic model plans ”what” will happen.
There are many different methodologies used to develop logic models; however, their components generally include:
- Inputs: Resources used to implement the intervention (e.g., funding, staff, training materials).
- Activities: Actions taken to achieve the desired outcomes (e.g., conducting workshops, providing services).
- Outputs: Immediate products or measurements of the activities (e.g., number of workshops held, number of people served).
- Outcomes: The effects expected to occur because of the intervention. These should be the opposite of the issue’s existing negative consequences (e.g., increased graduation rates, improved resource access).
- Impact: The portion of the outcomes that can be directly attributed to the intervention, demonstrating a clear cause-and-effect relationship (e.g., reduced disease incidence due to a vaccination campaign).
WHAT OUTCOMES CAN RESULT FROM AN INTERVENTION?
As you set outcome goals for the intervention, keep in mind the different types of outcomes that could occur as a result. Your logic model may include multiple types of outcomes. The following examples build on the malnutrition case among rural children introduced in the outcome goals section to present the different categories of outcomes.
- Short-term outcomes: The immediate effects after intervention implementation (e.g., improved access to nutritious food through mobile deliveries, increased access to nutritional knowledge among community members).
- Intermediate outcomes: The effects seen if the intervention is tracked over months, which may be included in the logic model if considered necessary (e.g., improved dietary diversity in households, greater community participation in nutrition initiatives).
- Long-term outcomes: The sustained changes that occur after intervention implementation (e.g., reduction in chronic malnutrition—like stunting or underweight children, strengthened local systems to prevent malnutrition).
- Impact: The portion of the outcomes that can be directly attributed to the intervention, demonstrating a clear cause-and-effect relationship (e.g., 20% increase in household dietary diversity scores directly linked to nutrition education sessions, based on pre/post surveys).
Once developed, the structure of your logic model should look somewhat similar to the example below.
WHAT IS BACKWARDS MAPPING AND HOW DOES IT HELP IN DEVELOPING A LOGIC MODEL?
One method often used to develop a logic model is backwards mapping. You begin by defining the desired impact you hope to have on your chosen social issue and start working backward to determine the necessary steps to achieve it.7 This approach ensures that every activity in the intervention is directly linked to the end goal.
If your desired impact was to decrease homelessness rates in your hometown and you chose to use backwards mapping as your logic model strategy, the process would look something like this.
Step 1: Desired Long-Term Outcome
What is the ultimate goal of the intervention?
- Reduced homelessness, reflected in increased long-term housing stability for individuals and families.
Step 2: Short-Term Outcomes
What must change for this impact to occur?
- More individuals and families secure and retain stable housing.
- Individuals increase income stability and financial capability.
- Barriers to housing (e.g., credit issues, lack of documentation) are reduced.
Step 3: Identify Outputs
What measurable results indicate progress toward these outcomes?
- Number of individuals placed into stable housing.
- Number of participants completing financial literacy or job readiness programs.
- Number of individuals receiving housing support services (e.g., case management).
Step 4: Identify Activities
What actions will produce these outputs?
- Develop and maintain affordable housing units.
- Provide rental assistance and housing navigation services.
- Offer financial literacy and employment support programs.
- Deliver case management to address individual barriers.
Step 5: Identify Inputs
What resources are required to carry out these activities?
- Funding (government grants, donations).
- Trained staff (case managers, financial counselors).
- Partnerships with housing providers and employers.
- Facilities, materials, and administrative infrastructure.
By the end of this exercise, you will have clarified potential next steps, as well as each piece of your logic model. The goal of backwards mapping, and the logic model as a whole, is to provide you with a step-by-step overview of how to move forward in achieving your desired impact.
Imagine a program is working to reduce hunger in your city. Using backwards mapping, start with a desired outcome goal and work backward to identify the necessary inputs, activities, and outputs to achieve the desired outcomes and impact.
SUMMARY
This chapter introduced the theory of change as a practical framework for designing, testing, and refining social interventions. At its core, a theory of change begins with a clear understanding of a social problem and defines outcome goals that address its contributing factors and negative consequences. From there, a logic model maps how inputs, activities, and outputs are expected to lead to those outcomes and, ultimately, to long-term impact. Backwards mapping strengthens this process by starting with the desired end state and working step-by-step to ensure that every action is intentionally aligned with that goal.
In social impact work, where resources are limited and challenges are complex, this level of clarity is essential. Without it, efforts can become disconnected, ineffective, or difficult to measure. A well-defined theory of change helps organizations make informed decisions, allocate resources strategically, and adapt their approach based on evidence and learning.
ENDNOTES
1 - Center for Theory of Change. 2023. “What Is Theory of Change? | Theory of Change Community.”
2 - Center for Theory of Change. 2023. “How Does Theory of Change Work?” Theory of Change Community. July 18, 2023.
3 - CVE Reference Guide for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism. 2004. “Creating a Theory of Change.” https://www.cvereferenceguide.org/index.php/en/ design/creating-theory-change
4 - Annie E. Casey Foundation. 2022. “Developing a Theory of Change: Practical Guidance.” PDF. https://assets.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/aecftheoryofchange-guidance-2022.pdf
5 - Fire, Council. 2026. “Theory of Change.” Councilfire.org. Council Fire. January 6, 2026. https://www.councilfire.org/definitions/theory-ofchange.
6 - Conrardy , Alyssa. 2022. “The Theory of Change: Everything Your Nonprofit Needs to Know.” Prosper Stategies . September 8, 2022. https://prosper-strategies.com/what-is-a-theory-ofchange-and-when-does-your-nonprofit-need-one/.
7 - Center for Theory of Change, “What Is Theory of Change?”.
Resources published and shared by the Ballard Center are not necessarily endorsed by BYU or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.