Chapter 17: Scaling Social Impact
When you’re done with this section, you’ll be able to...
Understand and explain different intervention scaling methods.
Identify which scaling method best suits a specific intervention by weighing the pros and cons of each option within the situation.
Build basic scaling plans for various interventions.
INTRODUCTION
Once you’ve implemented your intervention and demonstrated its effectiveness within a specific population or context, the next step is to consider how it can grow. Scaling is not simply doing more of the same—it is the intentional and strategic expansion of your intervention’s reach, depth, or influence. It requires careful planning to ensure that what made the intervention successful at a smaller scale can be sustained and adapted as it grows.
As organizations scale, they may expand to serve more people, extend their work into new geographic areas, or deepen their impact by addressing additional dimensions of a problem. Scaling can also involve replicating successful models in new contexts or partnering with others to broaden reach. However, growth introduces new challenges, including maintaining quality, adapting to different environments, and ensuring sufficient resources and infrastructure. When done thoughtfully, scaling allows organizations to amplify their impact, bringing effective solutions to more people while continuing to respond to the complexities of the social issues they aim to address.
HOW DO YOU SCALE AN INTERVENTION?
Because different situations require different goals, scaling isn’t a copy-and-paste process. A successful intervention in one context may require some fine-tuning to be successful on a different scale. There are three primary approaches to scaling an intervention: depth, reach, and replication. Each approach offers different paths to growth and impact, and the approach you choose will depend on thoughtful consideration of your organization’s goals, the nature of the problem you’re addressing, and the unique needs of the population you’re serving. Each approach also offers different advantages and challenges to be carefully considered.
To scale effectively, you must follow the same rigorous principles that guided your initial intervention, or in other words, apply the Social Impact Cycle. First, understand the problem and the people affected through thorough research and community engagement. Second, design a clear, strategic scaling plan using methods like backward mapping and human-centered design. Third, implement and test your plan at different levels, measuring success along the way to ensure you achieve your intended outcomes. Fourth, evaluate the results, identify what worked and what didn’t, and refine your approach to maximize impact while minimizing unintended consequences. Regardless of your chosen scaling approach, returning to the phases of the Social Impact Cycle is a key step in preparing your solution for its next iteration. The following sections will address each approach further, providing you with the necessary information to choose the right approach for your intervention.
What makes scaling successful? Consider both the technical aspects (funding, infrastructure, capacity) and the relational aspects (community trust, cultural sensitivity, stakeholder engagement).
HOW CAN I DEEPEN MY IMPACT?
Scaling Through Depth
Scaling through depth means deepening your impact on the individual(s) you’ve already helped. Rather than expanding the number of people you’re serving, increasing depth means enhancing the quality and breadth of the services you offer them. This approach addresses additional root causes and negative consequences connected to your social issue and provides another layer of support to the specific population you’re already working with.
To scale through depth, you might choose a new negative consequence of the social problem you’re currently working with and adjust or expand on your existing intervention to address that consequence. Set new outcome goals and make plans to measure your deepened impact. Then focus on building solutions that are complementary to your existing intervention or expand the range of services you offer.1 Scaling for depth allows you to concentrate your resources on one specific population and pursue true transformative change within that targeted group.
Real-World Example: Reading Partners, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving literacy rates among elementary school students, initially focused on helping children read at grade level through one-on-one tutoring. After successfully achieving measurable reading gains, the organization decided to deepen its impact by addressing additional barriers to educational success. They began incorporating social-emotional learning into their tutoring sessions, recognizing that many struggling readers also faced confidence issues and anxiety about school. By training tutors to build students’ self-esteem alongside their reading skills, Reading Partners created more profound, lasting change in the children’s overall academic trajectories and life outcomes.
Benefits of Scaling Through Depth
- Enhanced Impact: By addressing several interconnected aspects of a social issue, you can create a more profound and lasting change for your target population, often breaking cycles that your initial intervention couldn’t address alone.
- Strengthened Relationships: This approach often fosters stronger, more trusting connections within the community you serve. It demonstrates a long-term commitment to the population’s overall well-being rather than a transactional service delivery model.
- Comprehensive Solutions: Tackling multiple facets of a problem can lead to more holistic and sustainable outcomes, addressing root causes rather than just symptoms and creating systemic change within the existing community.
HOW CAN I INCREASE MY REACH?
Scaling Through Reach
Scaling through reach means expanding your intervention beyond the initially chosen population to serve more people who experience the same social problem. The goal is to increase the number of individuals benefiting from your intervention while maintaining the quality and effectiveness that made it successful initially.
To scale your reach, you might broaden the targeted population within the initial intervention area by serving two adjacent towns rather than just one. The process of expanding reach will likely involve increasing resources and staffing, expanding your physical or digital infrastructure, forming strategic partnerships with organizations that can help you reach more people, and finding innovative ways to connect with those you have not yet reached but who could benefit from your services.2 The key is maintaining fidelity to your original model while adapting your delivery mechanisms to serve more people effectively.
Real-World Example: Crisis Text Line, a mental health organization that provides free, 24/7 crisis support via text message, initially launched in the United States with limited capacity to serve young people experiencing emotional crises. As they demonstrated success and demand grew exponentially, they increased their reach by recruiting and training thousands more volunteer crisis counselors, developing sophisticated AI-powered systems to prioritize the most urgent conversations, and expanding their texting capacity to handle hundreds of thousands of conversations monthly. They maintained their proven intervention model while dramatically expanding the number of people they could serve, eventually reaching four countries (the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, and the United States) and serving diverse populations including LGBTQ+ youth, veterans, and individuals in abusive situations.
Benefits of Scaling Through Reach
- Broader Impact: More people benefit from your successful intervention, resulting in a broader-scale change within the community or society, and potentially preventing problems that would be caused by the social problem if left unaddressed.
- Increased Awareness: Expanding reach often involves raising awareness about both your intervention and the social issue itself, which can lead to greater community support, increased funding opportunities, and broader participation from stakeholders.
- Foundation for Further Scaling: This approach often lays the groundwork for further expansion or replication, as it tests your capacity to serve larger populations and helps identify operational challenges before you attempt to scale in new locations.
HOW CAN I REPLICATE MY SUCCESS ELSEWHERE?
Scaling Through Replication
Scaling through replication involves taking a successful intervention or model and implementing it in new geographical locations, different communities, or even across different cultural contexts. This approach is about broadening the scope of your impact by reproducing your methods, strategies, or entire operational models in other settings where similar problems exist, but your services haven’t yet reached.
To successfully replicate your intervention, you must carefully consider the unique factors of each new location, thoughtfully adapt your strategies accordingly, and build the necessary capacity to support the intervention in the new context. This process often involves training new teams who understand both your model and their local context, forming partnerships with local organizations who have community trust and knowledge, and ensuring that your intervention is culturally and contextually appropriate.3 You should create systems for knowledge sharing, quality control, and continuous learning across all sites while allowing for local adaptation and innovation. In essence, replication isn’t merely copying and pasting a successful intervention into a new location but adapting a successful solution to a new setting.
Real-World Example: Kiva, a microfinance organization that connects lenders with entrepreneurs in underserved communities, successfully pioneered its crowdfunded microlending model in East Africa. After proving the model’s effectiveness in reducing poverty and empowering small business owners, Kiva replicated its approach across more than 80 countries worldwide. However, they didn’t simply duplicate their model. They adapted their strategies to account for different banking regulations, cultural attitudes toward lending and borrowing, local economic conditions, and varying levels of internet connectivity in each new location. They partnered with local microfinance institutions that understood their communities, provided training for local staff, and adjusted loan terms and structures to match cultural norms while maintaining their core principle of zero-interest, crowdfunded loans. This thoughtful replication has enabled Kiva to facilitate over $1.6 billion in loans to more than four million borrowers globally.
Benefits of Scaling Through Replication
- Impact Across Borders: Successful models can be scaled to impact multiple communities, regions, or countries, potentially creating global change and addressing problems that transcend geographic boundaries.
- Sustainable Growth: Replication supports the sustainable expansion of a proven intervention, allowing it to adapt to various contexts and cultural nuances while maintaining the core principles and effectiveness that made it successful initially.
- Broad Social Change: This approach contributes to widespread social change by addressing similar issues in diverse locations, leading to a cumulative global impact and creating networks of practitioners who can learn from each other’s experiences and innovations.
HOW DO I CHOOSE THE RIGHT SCALING APPROACH?
Scaling your intervention presents a significant opportunity to enhance social impact. However, expansion also carries substantial risks. If not carefully planned and executed, scaling can unintentionally exacerbate problems rather than solve them. To ensure positive outcomes, you should approach scaling with the same level of care and strategic planning as your original intervention, if not more. Interventions should be scaled in the right way, for the right people, in the right place, and at the right time.
Thoughtful, data-driven, and community-centered planning is essential to scaling while safeguarding your intended impact. As you consider how to grow, revisit your logic model to reassess the inputs, activities, and outcomes that guided your initial work. Determine whether your desired outcomes and long-term impact have evolved now that your intervention has proven effective and clarify what success looks like at a larger scale. Use available data and feedback from the communities you serve to identify where your model is strongest, where it may need adaptation, and what risks could emerge with expansion. From there, evaluate which scaling approach—whether increasing reach, deepening impact, or replicating in new contexts—best align with your updated goals. By grounding these decisions in evidence and community insight, you increase the likelihood that your intervention will remain effective, relevant, and sustainable as it grows.
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE BEFORE SCALING?
Before scaling, you must thoroughly assess the key factors that shape the local context where you plan to expand. This includes understanding cultural traditions and their significance to community identity and social cohesion, evaluating current practices and their effectiveness, and considering the region’s economic stability, resource availability, and infrastructure capacity.4 Local assets, both human and material, must also be considered to ensure your intervention can be sustained long-term without creating unsustainable dependencies on external funding or expertise.
Additionally, you must evaluate your own capacity to scale, ensuring you have the necessary funding, expertise, operational structure, staff capacity, and strategic partnerships to support expansion without compromising the quality or effectiveness of your intervention. Engaging with the community, conducting rigorous research, and identifying potential risks and unintended consequences are critical steps in determining whether and how your intervention should be scaled. By integrating these considerations thoughtfully, you can expand in a way that is both effective and ethically responsible.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN SCALING IS DONE UNSUCCESSFULLY?
The decline of traditional rice farming in Bali, Indonesia, is a striking example of the risks of scaling. For centuries, Balinese farmers relied on the Subak system, a sophisticated, community-managed irrigation method overseen by water temple priests. This system not only distributed water equitably, but also controlled pests naturally by coordinating the alternating planting of wet and dry fields. The Subak was more than an agricultural technique. It was deeply embedded in Balinese spiritual and social life and a reflection of Hindu philosophy.
In the 1970s, as part of the Green Revolution, the Indonesian government introduced high-yield rice varieties, chemical fertilizers, and continuous cropping schedules to boost production and achieve national food security. External development agencies, eager to modernize Indonesian agriculture and increase yields, encouraged rapid adoption of these new methods without fully understanding the complexity of the existing Subak system. Initially, yields soared, and the intervention appeared successful by conventional metrics.
However, the rapid shift disrupted Bali’s ecological balance. The new farming methods required more water than the island’s irrigation system could sustainably provide, and continuous planting eliminated the natural pest control cycle that had evolved over centuries, leading to severe infestations of rice pests like the brown planthopper. Farmers became dependent on expensive chemical pesticides that further damaged the ecosystem and reduced soil fertility over time. As a result, harvest began to decline. Beyond damaging the ecosystem, these changes also fractured Balinese society in profound ways. Farmers, once united by the cooperative Subak system where decisions were made collectively and benefits were shared communally, began competing for limited water resources. Conflicts arose as some farmers adhered to government mandates while others resisted, creating economic disparities and weakening long-standing community ties that had sustained villages for generations.5 Additionally, the religious significance of the water temples diminished as agricultural decisions moved from community priests to government agricultural offices, eroding cultural identity and social cohesion.
A more effective approach might have enhanced the existing Subak system rather than replacing it entirely. Integrating modern agricultural advancements with traditional practices, such as improving irrigation efficiency through better canal maintenance, selectively introducing new rice strains that were compatible with the existing planting cycles, or providing organic pest management training that complemented natural pest control, could have increased yields without destabilizing local ecosystems and communities. The unfortunate experience of these Balinese farmers underscores the need for thorough research, deep cultural understanding, and genuine collaboration with local stakeholders before scaling interventions. It demonstrates that solutions should aim to strengthen and build upon existing systems rather than undermine or replace them, and that seemingly successful short-term metrics can mask long-term damage to social, cultural, and environmental systems.
Can you think of a service, product, or program that worked well for one group of people but failed to meet the needs of another? Why was this the case? What cultural, economic, or contextual factors might have been overlooked during the scaling or implementation process?
SUMMARY
Scaling your social impact intervention is a valuable step in maximizing the positive change your SPSO can create. Whether you choose to scale through deepening impact, increasing reach, or replicating success, each approach offers different advantages and challenges that must be carefully weighed. Understanding these approaches and selecting the right one based on the organization’s goals, available resources, and the specific needs of the population you serve is key to achieving your long-term mission.
However, scaling is not simply about growth; it’s about responsible, thoughtful expansion that respects existing community systems and prioritizes the voices and needs of those you’re serving. Your scaling decisions should be guided by rigorous research, community engagement, and honest assessment of both opportunities and risks. When done well, scaling can amplify your impact exponentially and transform lives across communities. When done poorly, it can cause harm, waste resources, and undermine the very communities you seek to support. The difference lies in your commitment to maintaining the quality of your intervention.
ENDNOTES
1 - Desa, G., & Koch, J. L. (2014). Scaling Social Impact: Building Sustainable Social Ventures at the Base-of-the-Pyramid. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 146–174. https://doi.org/10 .1080/19420676.2013.871325
2 - Fay Hanleybrown, John Kania, and Mark Kramer, “Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work,” Stanford Social Innovation Review (2012), https://ssir.org/articles/entry/channeling_ change_making_collective_impact_work.
3 - Seelos, Christian, and Johanna Mair. Innovation and Scaling for Impact: How Effective Social Enterprises Do It. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press, 2017.
4 - Cooley, Larry, Richard Kohl, and Rajani Ved. Scaling Up: From Vision to Large-Scale Change: A Management Framework for Practitioners. 2016
5 - Pryor, Thomas Carson. “Green Revolution Reconsidered: Ecological Consequences in Bali Rice Systems.” Human Ecology 22, no. 1 (1994): 83–95.
Resources published and shared by the Ballard Center are not necessarily endorsed by BYU or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.